Master volatile memory forensics and incident response automation in Python 3. Learn virtual memory mechanics, page table traversal, Volatility 3 integration, YARA memory scanning, and live /
10 min read
Build a zero-dependency Python 3.11+ AST detection engine that transpiles Sigma rules into Microsoft KQL, Elastic EQL, and real-time in-memory event evaluators.
Byline: Syed Zada Abrar
Organization: SentinelReign & Andrax Pentester
Published: May 2026
Legacy Linux detection architectures rely on asynchronous audit log parsers (auditd) or polling userland processes. This introduces noticeable index latency and CPU overhead, creating a dangerous blind spot against modern living-off-the-land (LotL) binaries, eBPF-based rootkits, and container breakout vectors.
This masterclass presents a first-principles engineering framework for compiling standard SigmaHQ YAML detection rules into an abstract syntax tree (AST) that evaluates live Linux kernel tracepoints (sys_enter_execve, sys_enter_bpf, security_file_open) in real time using eBPF (Extended Berkeley Packet Filter). By eliminating userland SIEM index latency, security teams can achieve microsecond-level detection and stateful LSM (Linux Security Module) prevention directly inside the Linux kernel.
Traditional SIEM detection pipelines operate retroactively:
auditd formats log -> 3. Daemon writes to disk -> 4. Log collector ships to indexer -> 5. SIEM executes query.+------------------+ +---------------+ +---------------+ +------------------+
| Kernel Tracepoint| --> | Audit Daemon | --> | Log Indexer | --> | SIEM Query Engine|
| (sys_enter_exec) | | (User Space) | | (Elastic/SPL) | | (Delayed Alerts) |
+------------------+ +---------------+ +---------------+ +------------------+
With eBPF kernel event streams, event evaluation occurs in-memory at kernel ring buffer emission:
+------------------+ +-------------------+ +---------------------+
| Kernel Tracepoint| --> | eBPF Ring Buffer | --> | In-Memory AST Engine| --> [Instant Alert /
| (sys_enter_exec) | | (BPF_MAP_RINGBUF) | | (Microsecond Match) | LSM Prevention]
+------------------+ +-------------------+ +---------------------+
SigmaHQ rules are historically Windows-centric. To evaluate them against Linux kernel tracepoints, an alias rewrite engine translates abstract Sigma fields to eBPF struct fields at parse time:
| Sigma Standard Field | Windows Event Log Equivalent | Linux eBPF Kernel Struct Mapping | Operational Description |
|---|---|---|---|
Image | NewProcessName | details.filename | Absolute path of executable binary |
CommandLine | CommandLine | details.command_args | Full argument string from sys_enter_execve |
ParentImage | ParentProcessName | details.parent_filename | Process name of parent PID via LRU map |
User | SubjectUserName | details.uid -> /etc/passwd | Execution user context |
TargetFilename | TargetFilename | details.filepath | Target file path for security_file_open |
Below is the annotated C code for attaching an eBPF program to tp/syscalls/sys_enter_execve to capture execution telemetry:
#include <vmlinux.h>
#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
struct exec_event {
u32 pid;
u32 ppid;
u32 uid;
char filename[256];
char args[512];
};
struct {
__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_RINGBUF);
__uint(max_entries, 256 * 1024);
} ringbuf SEC(".maps");
SEC("tp/syscalls/sys_enter_execve")
int handle_execve(struct trace_event_raw_sys_enter *ctx)
{
struct exec_event *event;
// Allocate space in the kernel ring buffer
event = bpf_ringbuf_reserve(&ringbuf, sizeof(*event), 0);
if (!event)
return 0;
// Capture PID, PPID, and UID directly from kernel context
u64 pid_tgid = bpf_get_current_pid_tgid();
event->pid = pid_tgid >> 32;
event->uid = bpf_get_current_uid_gid();
// Read binary path from sys_enter_execve argument 0
const char *filename_ptr = (const char *)BPF_CORE_READ(ctx, args[0]);
bpf_probe_read_str(event->filename, sizeof(event->filename), filename_ptr);
// Read argument vector from sys_enter_execve argument 1
const char **args_ptr = (const char **)BPF_CORE_READ(ctx, args[1]);
if (args_ptr) {
bpf_probe_read_str(event->args, sizeof(event->args), args_ptr[0]);
}
// Submit event to userland AST evaluation engine
bpf_ringbuf_submit(event, 0);
return 0;
}
char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
When loading a Sigma rule like GTFOBins abuse or reverse shell execution, the AST parser compiles condition modifiers (contains, endswith, contains|all) into load-time decision nodes:
title: Suspicious Interactive Shell Spawning via Network Utility
id: 9a2b8e30-ebpf-sigma-2026
status: experimental
description: Detects reverse shell invocation via netcat/bash execution in Linux eBPF telemetry
logsource:
category: process_creation
product: linux
detection:
selection_binary:
Image|endswith:
- '/nc'
- '/ncat'
- '/netcat'
selection_args:
CommandLine|contains:
- '-e /bin/bash'
- '-e /bin/sh'
- '>& /dev/tcp/'
condition: selection_binary and selection_args
falsepositives:
- Authorized administrator maintenance scripts
level: high
prctl PR_SET_NAME): Adversaries can overwrite argv[0] or process comm names. Defense: Always extract binary paths from sys_enter_execve register pointers directly rather than reading /proc/PID/comm.git, make, cat) can saturate ring buffers. Defense: Implement an dynamic allowlist engine (allowlist.toml) evaluated at parse time.auditd logging for sub-millisecond execution tracking.Image, CommandLine) to eBPF struct layouts using parse-time alias rewrites.Authored under byline Syed Zada Abrar for Andrax Pentester & SentinelReign.
Share this article
13 min read
Deep technical masterclass on eBPF security engineering: building real-time kernel execution monitoring in C & Go with CO-RE, analyzing offensive rootkits, and hardening Linux systems.
15 min read
Sign in to leave a comment.